1996-11-04 - Re: Censorship on cypherpunks

Header Data

From: Declan McCullagh <declan@eff.org>
To: Will French <wfrench@interport.net>
Message Hash: 1f4ab6ce77324bf40285f462ea58a9e9f9e9458b9905ef63a33109754a1ceed1
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961104044408.13104A-100000@eff.org>
Reply To: <199611032354.SAA01354@interport.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-04 12:45:49 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 4 Nov 1996 04:45:49 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Declan McCullagh <declan@eff.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 1996 04:45:49 -0800 (PST)
To: Will French <wfrench@interport.net>
Subject: Re: Censorship on cypherpunks
In-Reply-To: <199611032354.SAA01354@interport.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961104044408.13104A-100000@eff.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

Libertarianism is not incompatible with strict regulations, as long as 
the rules violate nobody's rights.


On Sun, 3 Nov 1996, Will French wrote:

>   Except it's not very effective, is it, since he's still
> posting flames?  In any case, it's an admission on John
> Gilmore's part that libertarianism can't work without some
> measure of authoritarianism; the only argument is over _just how
> much_ authoritarianism we need.
>   I'm quite upset about this.  Up to now I was able to tell
> people that "there is at least one mailing list on the net that
> functions in a completely open manner".  No more.
> Will French  <wfrench@interport.net>

// declan@eff.org // I do not represent the EFF // declan@well.com //