1997-06-23 - Re: New PGP signatures

Header Data

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
To: mark@unicorn.com (Mark Grant)
Message Hash: cbcc630d9daf46ae51722a72a88604dedc1431734800f050fc348adad58bd072
Message ID: <199706231334.JAA15896@homeport.org>
Reply To: <Pine.SOL.3.96.970623055041.2746A-100000@sirius.infonex.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-23 13:51:54 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 21:51:54 +0800

Raw message

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 21:51:54 +0800
To: mark@unicorn.com (Mark Grant)
Subject: Re: New PGP signatures
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.96.970623055041.2746A-100000@sirius.infonex.com>
Message-ID: <199706231334.JAA15896@homeport.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

| Could I humbly request that people don't post the new (SHA?) PGP
| signatures to the list for the time being as it's a pain in the ass for
| those of us outside the US who don't yet have the ability to read them.
| PGP 2.6.x error handling doesn't know what to do with them and it breaks
| our mail-processing code.

	Better yet, could PGP release source code so those of us not
lucky enough to own a Mac, Windows, or other supported platform can
move ahead with porting?


"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."