1997-08-02 - Re: non-censorous spam control (was Re: Spam is Information?)

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
To: freedom-knights@jetcafe.org
Message Hash: 4bc3c71de1e6c3b27a912d033e52978dfc443a96cdabc3d255b141792ee583bf
Message ID: <V5aTae3w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <Pine.LNX.3.93.970731185306.693C-100000@shirley>
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-02 15:20:29 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 2 Aug 1997 08:20:29 -0700 (PDT)

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 1997 08:20:29 -0700 (PDT)
To: freedom-knights@jetcafe.org
Subject: Re: non-censorous spam control (was Re: Spam is Information?)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.93.970731185306.693C-100000@shirley>
Message-ID: <V5aTae3w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} <dformosa@st.nepean.uws.edu.au> writes:

> On Thu, 31 Jul 1997, Adam Back wrote:

[detect multi-post]
> > That is cancel all but one groups worth of articles, and then modify
> > the Newsgroups line to cross-post to all the groups the article was
> > originally posted to.
> No that is worce,  it would be forgery of the orginal post.  In addtion it
> would violate the usenet requirement to avoid modifing the post.

In my opinion, the hnorable way to deal with multi-posts is to detect them
automatically and to ignore them. A NoCeM 'bot like the one run by the
Venerable CancelMoose is a good thing.

A compression scheme where many copies of the same text would be transmitted
only once even if they're posted once would be an excellent thing (given that
such traffic is a very substantial
portion of a full uncensored feed), but it's not crucial.


Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps