From: Michael Brock <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: “‘Lucky Green’” <email@example.com>
Message Hash: 8c2d7bb61cad6b0ed8aecc6c17890fee78106ca688fff6f215c16cd17654b5e7
Message ID: <01BCC9F4.D0AF8BE0@dasc2-106.flash.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-26 02:08:33 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 10:08:33 +0800
From: Michael Brock <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 10:08:33 +0800 To: "'Lucky Green'" <email@example.com> Subject: RE: Oxley Amendment Message-ID: <01BCC9F4.D0AF8BE0@dasc2-106.flash.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain I agree that there should be *NO* rules about encryption... If the government wants to break encryption, buy the people who hack it and let them go just like every other good industrial country... M. -----Original Message----- From: Lucky Green [SMTP:firstname.lastname@example.org] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 1997 9:17 AM To: Michael Brock Cc: email@example.com Subject: Re: Oxley Amendment On Wed, 24 Sep 1997, Michael Brock wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I wonder if Mr. Solomon of NY will rethink his decision to not bring > up SAFE without Oxley to the entire House after the unprecedented > coaltion of companies and individual groups that came together to > make sure that mandatory key recovery stays a "1984" like dream. I > find it incomprehensible that one man, would block the introduction > of this bill, after it being proved that this is what his > constituents want.... What in the world makes you believe that Mr. Solomon's constituents would want SAFE to go the the floor? SAFE *must* be defeated, with or without the Oxley ammendment. -- Lucky Green <firstname.lastname@example.org> PGP encrypted email preferred. "Tonga? Where the hell is Tonga? They have Cypherpunks there?"