1997-10-02 - Re: Stronghold

Header Data

From: Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: cd1eb1618e4ac670e5f3c097ac7acb2c9f7c55198a1d5284796b043079dd1788
Message ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971002204421.3283B-100000@pakastelohi.cypherpunks.to>
Reply To: <199710021515.RAA14546@basement.replay.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-02 19:09:24 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 3 Oct 1997 03:09:24 +0800

Raw message

From: Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 1997 03:09:24 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: Stronghold
In-Reply-To: <199710021515.RAA14546@basement.replay.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971002204421.3283B-100000@pakastelohi.cypherpunks.to>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

On Thu, 2 Oct 1997, Anonymous wrote:

> C2Net was wrong to censor the cypherpunks list in the guise of moderation.
> It was wrong to send threatening letters to people who claimed its
> products were weak.  The whole moderation/censorship experiment was a
> terrible mistake.  The actions taken by C2Net were completely unjustified.

Where do people get these bizarre ideas? C2 didn't censor the list. A guy
who happened to work for C2 dropped some messages from one list. The
messages still went out on the unfiltered list. Had he worked for Mc
Donald's or the the NYC Sanitiation Department, would you blame them for
this as well? 

-- Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to> PGP encrypted email preferred. 
   "Tonga? Where the hell is Tonga? They have Cypherpunks there?"