1998-08-05 - Re: of Re: of the dickwads thing…

Header Data

From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 03fd4514fc97f14fada0373613796153d6163c3c28dae33ef05f34a84679ef4f
Message ID: <199808050520.HAA22850@replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-08-05 05:20:20 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 4 Aug 1998 22:20:20 -0700 (PDT)

Raw message

From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 1998 22:20:20 -0700 (PDT)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: of Re: of the dickwads thing...
Message-ID: <199808050520.HAA22850@replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

I hope it can't be tracked, even by the operators.  That is the point
of making it anonymous. :)

I take no offense to a post suck as this. The sender obviously knows
almost nothing of the remailers,  letters coming out in a different
order preserve untracability.  The point for the names such as
Anonymous and Nobody are so you know it's  an anon remailer, there is
no reason to hide it and it helps to identify them.  If you want to
hide it you can.

---kryz <chrisharwig@hetnet.nl> wrote:
> I'm a pretty ignorant "cypherpunk".  I believe that this crap can be
> uncovered.
> Or is it a test or some thing like that.
> Why not crack the "Anonymous" person and hang 'm high. I can't do
> helas!
> Maybe you can?

> : they
> : can't even get their messages to come out in the same order that
> : came in by...
> :   Dumb, eh? Some of the test messages I sent to myself came back
in a
> : different order from that what I sent them in. I guess these guys
> : know much about computers, eh?
> :   And those names, 'Anonymous' and 'Nobody', aren't fooling AnyBody,
> : because the minute you see them, you *know* that the message is
> : from a remailer.  Dumb, eh?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com