1998-08-27 - Re: LACC: Re: Is hate code speech?

Header Data

From: jkthomson <jkthomson@bigfoot.com>
To: Dan Stromberg <whgiii@openpgp.net>
Message Hash: 5f423c3d28385eec4b2c3ec3d205617bdd3b3bd63d156297ccc842430c6b2ed8
Message ID: <>
Reply To: <199808261937.OAA017.62@geiger.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-08-27 09:54:57 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1998 02:54:57 -0700 (PDT)

Raw message

From: jkthomson <jkthomson@bigfoot.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1998 02:54:57 -0700 (PDT)
To: Dan Stromberg <whgiii@openpgp.net>
Subject: Re: LACC: Re: Is hate code speech?
In-Reply-To: <199808261937.OAA017.62@geiger.com>
Message-ID: <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

At 12:42 PM 8/26/98 -0700, Dan Stromberg wrote:
>William H. Geiger III wrote:
>> >Sad that I wasted this much time responding.
>> Why, because I challenge your PC dogma and require to to rationally
>> justify it? We have an old saying here "If you are scared son, then say
>> you are scared". If you are unable to rationally and objectively justify
>> your PC dogma than just say so.
>Smirk.  /I'm terrified/  I've said it before, and I'll say it again:
>Never wrestle with a pig.  You both get dirty, and the pig likes it.

oh yes, an EXCELLENT justification of your 'PC beliefs'  How exactly does
that answer the challenge to defend your point of view?  Ad hominem attacks
are pretty low, even for list-members, think-ye-not?

 james 'keith' thomson <jkthomson@bigfoot.com>  www.bigfoot.com/~ceildh
 jkthomson:C181 991A 405C EAFB 2C46 79B5 B1DC DB78 8196 122D [06.07.98]
 ceildh   :1D79 59AF ED75 5945 6003 8240 DA34 ACCA 9DE4 6BC9 [05.14.98]
 ICQ:746241 <keys> at pgp.mit.edu     ...and former sysop of tnbnog BBS
Jennings Corollary to the Law of Selective Gravity:
  The chance of the bread falling with the butter side down
  is directly proportional to the value of the carpet.