1998-08-27 - Re: LACC: Re: Is hate code speech?

Header Data

From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 76333f5f8db2a0ac7b5d3cc835a3ea2653cdefbace3536eb2125ec0a123e166f
Message ID: <199808270237.EAA21620@replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-08-27 02:37:17 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 19:37:17 -0700 (PDT)

Raw message

From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 19:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: LACC: Re: Is hate code speech?
Message-ID: <199808270237.EAA21620@replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

On Wed, 26 Aug 1998, Dan Stromberg wrote:

> William H. Geiger III wrote:
> > >Sad that I wasted this much time responding.
> > 
> > Why, because I challenge your PC dogma and require to to rationally
> > justify it? We have an old saying here "If you are scared son, then say
> > you are scared". If you are unable to rationally and objectively justify
> > your PC dogma than just say so.
> Smirk.  /I'm terrified/  I've said it before, and I'll say it again:
> Never wrestle with a pig.  You both get dirty, and the pig likes it.

That's why I'm not wrestling with you. I'll just get dirty, and you'll
enjoy it.