1996-11-13 - Re: Black markets vs. cryptoanarchy

Header Data

From: “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>
To: Ted Anderson <ota+@transarc.com>
Message Hash: 74378ed086d7eed841cb4451b20c2b209f6d4169a14beddbba8dfd2c2ebe2ef3
Message ID: <199611130255.SAA25806@netcom11.netcom.com>
Reply To: <wmW_81eSMV0=1A_040@transarc.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-13 02:56:06 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 18:56:06 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: "Vladimir Z. Nuri" <vznuri@netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 18:56:06 -0800 (PST)
To: Ted Anderson <ota+@transarc.com>
Subject: Re: Black markets vs. cryptoanarchy
In-Reply-To: <wmW_81eSMV0=1A_040@transarc.com>
Message-ID: <199611130255.SAA25806@netcom11.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


I tend to agre with Ted Anderson's point that a shift
to cryptoanarchy will be a gradual process if it happens
at all. this is in total contrast to TCM who has, as
I recall, talked about "cryptoanarchy" as an example
of a phase discontinuity, i.e. an abrupt transition.

I personally would like to see a more specific description
of "cryptoanarchy" because it seems its originator is always
posting new messages about what it really is about, associating
it with new developments, and distancing it from areas of
stagnation or perceived criminality. a bit of "success 
has a thousand fathers, failure is an orphan" going on here.






Thread