1997-01-01 - Re: Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice

Header Data

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
To: “Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM” <dlv@bwalk.dm.com>
Message Hash: 590fb849f7860779f55e1f191802db9d8d1b6dd17a197ab7afa2f7bfa2c1d4a5
Message ID: <32C9F4A4.6394@gte.net>
Reply To: <NDuTZD58w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-01 05:24:00 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 31 Dec 1996 21:24:00 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 1996 21:24:00 -0800 (PST)
To: "Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM" <dlv@bwalk.dm.com>
Subject: Re: Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice
In-Reply-To: <NDuTZD58w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Message-ID: <32C9F4A4.6394@gte.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:
> "Timothy C. May" <tcmay@got.net> writes:
> > I'll continue to be radical in my views. Nothing wrong with extremism in
> > the defense of liberty, as some wise men said.

> Of course, "cypher punks" are opposed to liberty. Have you noticed that the
> only crypto-relevant thread in weeks is about protocols to stop free speech?

Could it be that most "serious" list subscribers are "security people"?

And who are the people in the U.S. who are most abusive of individual
rights and freedoms?  Voila.  Hence the heavy emphasis on preventing
this and that....






Thread