1997-04-15 - Re: FCPUNX:Advocating Violence

Header Data

From: jamesd@echeque.com
To: <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 01fa8a123722306d63cbed7e25ff8b8107a6d70e8deacfbff9417b38a755ea9c
Message ID: <199704150514.WAA03565@proxy1.ba.best.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-04-15 05:16:04 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 22:16:04 -0700 (PDT)

Raw message

From: jamesd@echeque.com
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 22:16:04 -0700 (PDT)
To: <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: FCPUNX:Advocating Violence
Message-ID: <199704150514.WAA03565@proxy1.ba.best.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 03:29 PM 4/13/97 -0800, Jim Bell wrote:
> Looked at traditionally, "we" have a
> military because "they" have militaries.  There appears to be no way out of
> this game, and thus in that context militaries could be viewed as a public
> good, or at least a public necessity.  But give the public a relatively easy
> option to exit this game, and that public good becomes a public evil.
> Naturally, it doesn't appear that way to the people who profit from such
> waste:  Government officials and employees, etc.

Area defence is a public good, and therefore can only 
be paid for by charity or by coercion.

Retribution, however is an excludable good.  Therefore it can 
be paid for by normal market mechanisms.
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   jamesd@echeque.com






Thread