1997-06-23 - Re: spam on this list

Header Data

From: Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
To: Jason William RENNIE <jrennie@hardy.ocs.mq.edu.au>
Message Hash: adb14fb4bac1ea0bde961fafffcb6e7e23683577be05df078c3b8c2457649c49
Message ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970623103511.8539B-100000@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
Reply To: <Pine.SOL.3.91.970623224324.26980A-100000@hardy.ocs.mq.edu.au>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-23 16:18:26 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 00:18:26 +0800

Raw message

From: Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 00:18:26 +0800
To: Jason William RENNIE <jrennie@hardy.ocs.mq.edu.au>
Subject: Re: spam on this list
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.91.970623224324.26980A-100000@hardy.ocs.mq.edu.au>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970623103511.8539B-100000@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

Can we "can" the "SPAM" discussion?  (ouch)

As one who has beaten this subject to death on this list in the past, I 
can attest that there is little new ground to cover, few minds to be 
changed, and no relevence to crypto.
Perhaps we can start a " SPAM" mailing list. I wonder if the Hormel folks
have a sense of humor? ;) (Is it Hormel? Can Dimitri get in touch with 
his buddy Spamford and get the real story?)

OTOH, I support your right to freely express your opinions in this forum 
and wouldn't dream of censoring you.