“geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com> (36 posts)

Be aware that many list participants used multiple email addresses over their time active on the list. As such this page may not contain all threads available.

Threads

WSJ on “IRS-bashing”

• 1996-05-29 (Thu, 30 May 1996 04:03:49 +0800) - WSJ on “IRS-bashing” - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>

FYA: SafE Mail Corporation

• 1996-06-18 (Tue, 18 Jun 1996 18:22:05 +0800) - FYA: SafE Mail Corporation - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>
  • 1996-06-19 (Wed, 19 Jun 1996 14:00:28 +0800) - Re: FYA: SafE Mail Corporation - Don <don@wero.cs.byu.edu>

RE: Fuseable Links - no guarantees??

• 1996-06-19 (Thu, 20 Jun 1996 07:57:05 +0800) - RE: Fuseable Links - no guarantees?? - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>
  • 1996-06-20 (Thu, 20 Jun 1996 18:47:14 +0800) - Re: Fuseable Links - no guarantees?? - Christian Wettergren <cwe@it.kth.se>

FW: Bashing “Wired”

• 1996-06-21 (Sat, 22 Jun 1996 07:33:26 +0800) - FW: Bashing “Wired” - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>

RE: AT&T bans anonymous messages

• 1996-06-25 (Wed, 26 Jun 1996 06:09:06 +0800) - RE: AT&T bans anonymous messages - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>

FW: MSoft crypto API’s

• 1996-07-10 (Wed, 10 Jul 1996 16:13:57 +0800) - FW: MSoft crypto API’s - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>

RE: FW: MSoft crypto API’s

• 1996-07-10 (Thu, 11 Jul 1996 04:23:19 +0800) - RE: FW: MSoft crypto API’s - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>

RE: MSoft crypto API’s

• 1996-07-10 (Thu, 11 Jul 1996 05:12:42 +0800) - RE: MSoft crypto API’s - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>

RE: NSA response to key length report

• 1996-07-20 (Sat, 20 Jul 1996 15:31:45 +0800) - RE: NSA response to key length report - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>

FW: A Snake-Oil FAQ

• 1996-07-21 (Mon, 22 Jul 1996 06:36:20 +0800) - FW: A Snake-Oil FAQ - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>

RE: INFO: Submit your testimony to Congress for hearings on July 25!

• 1996-07-22 (Tue, 23 Jul 1996 03:32:56 +0800) - RE: INFO: Submit your testimony to Congress for hearings on July 25! - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>

RE: evidence from the NIC - interpret and use as you will.

• 1996-07-22 (Tue, 23 Jul 1996 03:57:42 +0800) - RE: evidence from the NIC - interpret and use as you will. - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>

RE: Brute-forcing DES

• 1996-07-24 (Thu, 25 Jul 1996 04:17:05 +0800) - RE: Brute-forcing DES - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>

FW: Distributed DES crack

• 1996-07-25 (Thu, 25 Jul 1996 14:42:41 +0800) - FW: Distributed DES crack - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>

FW: LOOKING FOR THAT SPECIAL SOMEONE?

• 1996-07-29 (Mon, 29 Jul 1996 15:06:33 +0800) - FW: LOOKING FOR THAT SPECIAL SOMEONE? - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>

RE: Internet blamed for pipe bombs

• 1996-07-29 (Mon, 29 Jul 1996 15:20:03 +0800) - RE: Internet blamed for pipe bombs - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>

RE: Implementing DSS Fortezza KEA

• 1996-07-29 (Tue, 30 Jul 1996 03:13:45 +0800) - RE: Implementing DSS Fortezza KEA - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>

RE: Implementing KEA in Software

• 1996-07-30 (Wed, 31 Jul 1996 02:12:04 +0800) - RE: Implementing KEA in Software - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>

RE: Implementing KEA in Software

• 1996-07-30 (Wed, 31 Jul 1996 02:22:38 +0800) - RE: Implementing KEA in Software - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>

RE: Is Knuth’s AoCP still the authority on PRNG?

• 1996-09-04 (Wed, 4 Sep 1996 13:53:23 +0800) - RE: Is Knuth’s AoCP still the authority on PRNG? - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>

RE: Redundancy in XOR encryption

• 1996-09-18 (Thu, 19 Sep 1996 04:53:26 +0800) - RE: Redundancy in XOR encryption - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>

Snakeoil FAQ edits/comments

• 1996-09-19 (Thu, 19 Sep 1996 09:06:13 +0800) - Snakeoil FAQ edits/comments - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>

RE: SPAMS

• 1996-09-19 (Thu, 19 Sep 1996 14:35:54 +0800) - RE: SPAMS - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>

RE: Does any body know anything about this?

• 1996-09-30 (Mon, 30 Sep 1996 13:15:05 +0800) - RE: Does any body know anything about this? - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>

DESCrack keyspace partitioning

• 1996-10-04 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 19:58:22 +0800) - DESCrack keyspace partitioning - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>
  • 1996-10-04 (Sat, 5 Oct 1996 00:00:12 +0800) - Re: DESCrack keyspace partitioning - Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com>
    • 1996-10-04 (Sat, 5 Oct 1996 07:11:25 +0800) - Re: DESCrack keyspace partitioning - “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>
  • 1996-10-04 (Sat, 5 Oct 1996 01:25:37 +0800) - Re: DESCrack keyspace partitioning - Mike McNally <m5@tivoli.com>
  • 1996-10-04 (Sat, 5 Oct 1996 07:03:30 +0800) - Re: DESCrack keyspace partitioning - “Douglas B. Renner” <dougr@skypoint-gw.globelle.com>
    • 1996-10-10 (Wed, 9 Oct 1996 21:25:03 -0700 (PDT)) - Crypto AG - Secret GAK Partner ? - pclow <pclow@pc.jaring.my>
      • 1996-10-10 (Thu, 10 Oct 1996 00:42:09 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Crypto AG - Secret GAK Partner ? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
      • 1996-10-10 (Thu, 10 Oct 1996 01:33:11 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Crypto AG - Secret GAK Partner ? - Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
        • 1996-10-10 (Thu, 10 Oct 1996 02:13:30 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Crypto AG - Secret GAK Partner ? - pclow <pclow@pc.jaring.my>
  • 1996-10-05 (Sat, 5 Oct 1996 09:44:55 +0800) - Re: DESCrack keyspace partitioning - “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>

RE: DESCrack keyspace partitioning

• 1996-10-04 (Sat, 5 Oct 1996 04:50:15 +0800) - RE: DESCrack keyspace partitioning - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>

RE: DESCrack keyspace partitioning

• 1996-10-04 (Sat, 5 Oct 1996 05:09:22 +0800) - RE: DESCrack keyspace partitioning - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>

RE: DESCrack keyspace partitioning

• 1996-10-04 (Sat, 5 Oct 1996 05:29:16 +0800) - RE: DESCrack keyspace partitioning - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>

RE: DESCrack keyspace partitioning

• 1996-10-07 (Mon, 7 Oct 1996 16:59:55 +0800) - RE: DESCrack keyspace partitioning - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>

RE: Swan song…

• 1996-10-10 (Thu, 10 Oct 1996 08:54:06 -0700 (PDT)) - RE: Swan song… - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>

Production of ALPHACIPHER for Windows 95 and DOS Cancelled!

• 1996-10-18 (Thu, 17 Oct 1996 21:11:42 -0700 (PDT)) - Production of ALPHACIPHER for Windows 95 and DOS Cancelled! - ”! Drive” <drink@aa.net>
  • 1996-10-18 (Thu, 17 Oct 1996 22:06:20 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Production of ALPHACIPHER Snake Oil Cancelled! - “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
  • 1996-10-18 (Fri, 18 Oct 1996 08:32:41 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Production of ALPHACIPHER for Windows 95 and DOS Cancelled! - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>

Re: exporting signatures only/CAPI (was Re: Why not PGP?)

• 1996-10-12 (Sat, 12 Oct 1996 09:07:50 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: exporting signatures only/CAPI (was Re: Why not PGP?) - azur@netcom.com (Steve Schear)
  • 1996-10-12 (Sat, 12 Oct 1996 11:03:00 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: exporting signatures only/CAPI (was Re: Why not PGP?) - Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
    • 1996-10-13 (Sun, 13 Oct 1996 03:13:30 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: exporting signatures only/CAPI (was Re: Why not PGP?) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
    • 1996-10-17 (Thu, 17 Oct 1996 13:27:55 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: exporting signatures only/CAPI (was Re: Why not PGP?) - iang@cs.berkeley.edu (Ian Goldberg)
    • 1996-10-18 (Fri, 18 Oct 1996 05:43:41 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: exporting signatures only/CAPI (was Re: Why not PGP?) - Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com>
    • 1996-10-18 (Fri, 18 Oct 1996 08:42:26 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: exporting signatures only/CAPI (was Re: Why not PGP?) - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>
  • 1996-10-13 (Sun, 13 Oct 1996 03:13:32 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: exporting signatures only/CAPI (was Re: Why not PGP?) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>

probability question for math-heads

• 1996-10-24 (Wed, 23 Oct 1996 23:27:54 -0700 (PDT)) - probability question for math-heads - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>
  • 1996-10-24 (Thu, 24 Oct 1996 08:38:17 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: probability question for math-heads - “Douglas B. Renner” <dougr@skypoint-gw.globelle.com>
  • 1996-10-24 (Thu, 24 Oct 1996 09:47:31 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: probability question for math-heads - “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1996-10-25 (Fri, 25 Oct 1996 07:28:27 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: probability question for math-heads - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>

Re: [DES] Random vs Linear Keysearch.

• Unknown thread root
  • 1996-10-25 (Fri, 25 Oct 1996 07:42:40 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: [DES] Random vs Linear Keysearch. - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>

Proof that “cypher punks” have complete degenerated…

• 1996-12-06 (Fri, 6 Dec 1996 06:30:30 -0800 (PST)) - Proof that “cypher punks” have complete degenerated… - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
  • 1996-12-19 (Thu, 19 Dec 1996 04:14:54 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Proof that “cypher punks” have complete degenerated… - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>
    • 1996-12-19 (Thu, 19 Dec 1996 08:11:15 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Proof that “cypher punks” have complete degenerated… - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
  • 1996-12-19 (Thu, 19 Dec 1996 09:18:22 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Proof that “cypher punks” have complete degenerated… - Vangelis <vangelis@qnis.net>
  • 1996-12-20 (Thu, 19 Dec 1996 21:44:05 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Proof that “cypher punks” have complete degenerated… - Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
    • 1996-12-20 (Fri, 20 Dec 1996 11:05:30 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Proof that “cypher punks” have complete degenerated… - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)