From: Tom.Jennings@f111.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Tom Jennings)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2d70f4bb92f4ef328aae493b3882459b8bb67b24261f1bb28f4a91e316c8e243
Message ID: <2715.2AD37337@fidogate.FIDONET.ORG>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1992-10-07 23:46:07 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 7 Oct 92 16:46:07 PDT
From: Tom.Jennings@f111.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Tom Jennings)
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 92 16:46:07 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: re: introducers
Message-ID: <2715.2AD37337@fidogate.FIDONET.ORG>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
U> Detection of tampering is plenty good enough, I think, for
U> a _network_ policy of key distribution. For most people,
U> it will work fine.
I guess I had to come at this from the backside. You are right.
Accepting keys over the network will provide reasonably well-sealed
envelopes. It won't provide notarized, hand-delivered security, but
that's not what's needed *usually*.
U> For personal use, for people I know, I'm going to rely on
U> personally
U> exchanged keys.
Exactly.
* Origin: World Power Systems / FidoNews (1:125/111)
--
Tom Jennings - via FidoNet node 1:125/555
UUCP: ...!uunet!hoptoad!kumr!fidogate!111!Tom.Jennings
INTERNET: Tom.Jennings@f111.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG
Return to October 1992
Return to “Tom.Jennings@f111.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Tom Jennings)”
1992-10-07 (Wed, 7 Oct 92 16:46:07 PDT) - re: introducers - Tom.Jennings@f111.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Tom Jennings)