1992-10-09 - +-=*^
Header Data
From: Secret_Squirrel@Treehouse.COM
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 4b7db885ad2f8c9b50f47b7e01dff5dcd4bf4f8c93d38b54b2450802d2b96240
Message ID: <9210091712.AA27717@atdt.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1992-10-09 17:05:09 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 9 Oct 92 10:05:09 PDT
Raw message
From: Secret_Squirrel@Treehouse.COM
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 92 10:05:09 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: +-=*^
Message-ID: <9210091712.AA27717@atdt.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
re: Interface for re-mailer; why not hitch it to emacs or something?
re: problem with key distribution; right, OK, I hadn't thought that
there might be a security problem with casually giving someone your
key
without them being able to authenticate that it came from you. Good
point.
Here's my public key. If you feel it is not secure enough, we can
always use the cone of silence:
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: 2.0
23l1t34u
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Thread
Return to October 1992
- Return to “Peter Shipley <shipley@tfs.COM>”
Return to “Secret_Squirrel@Treehouse.COM”
- 1992-10-09 (Fri, 9 Oct 92 10:05:09 PDT) - +-=*^ - Secret_Squirrel@Treehouse.COM
- 1992-10-09 (Fri, 9 Oct 92 11:16:24 PDT) - Re: +-=*^ - Peter Shipley <shipley@tfs.COM>