From: gnu@cygnus.com
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 92 13:46:27 PDT
To: Eric Hughes <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Where to get further information about PEM
In-Reply-To: <9210131853.AA29373@soda.berkeley.edu>
Message-ID: <9210132046.AA19146@cygnus.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Get the latest Internet Drafts for PEM; the RFC's are out of date.

By ftp to nic.ddn.mil, directory internet-drafts:

-rw-r--r--  1 gvaudre  35978 Sep  4 03:36 draft-ietf-pem-algorithms-01.txt
-rw-r--r--  1 gvaudre  16031 Sep  2 03:36 draft-ietf-pem-forms-01.txt
-rw-r--r--  1 gvaudre  85132 Aug  7 03:30 draft-ietf-pem-keymgmt-01.txt
-rw-r--r--  1 gvaudre 104515 Jul 25 03:30 draft-ietf-pem-msgproc-02.txt
-rw-r--r--  1 gvaudre    128 Sep  2 03:36 draft-ietf-pem-notary-00.txt

	John

PS:  I too think that other key certification models besides "hierarchical"
are appropriate.  I think we can start from PEM software and PEM message
formats and evolve and experiment as appropriate.  Before you ask, currently
there is no PEM software widely available.  It's in alpha test.  It will
be released in full source code, and its development was funded by DARPA.