1992-11-27 - credibility & pseudonyms

Header Data

From: efrem@informix.com (Efrem Lipkin)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 104b911580d04ed971ba0fd303cdd1cc85ab33254b0bbc75b9ef2332fdd9729f
Message ID: <9211270916.AA25959@godzilla.informix.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1992-11-27 09:57:06 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 27 Nov 92 01:57:06 PST

Raw message

From: efrem@informix.com (Efrem Lipkin)
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 92 01:57:06 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: credibility & pseudonyms
Message-ID: <9211270916.AA25959@godzilla.informix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


I have this persistent image of what a great boon all these
encrypted networks will be for undercover work. Currently when
some species of cop or spy goes undercover they take on a nearly
full time acting job. They have to work for a long time to
establish their credentials and throughout the process are usually
in significant physical danger. I vaguely remember (the details are
probably wrong) some Isreali spy got as far as the position of Minister
of Defense in Jordan before he got hung.

With digital signatures a dozen secretaries could run a hundred or more
pseudoagents, build a solid reputation for each over years.

The same approach would work for a patient con man. 

Real credibility has to be tied to a physical body. Some thing
at risk.

--efrem





Thread