1992-11-20 - The legality of PGP

Header Data

From: pmetzger@shearson.com (Perry E. Metzger)
To: hkhenson@cup.portal.com
Message Hash: 135c82f8c8df1943eb9f01a91045b3c8f4d8317a7ef1214708ea3d6de5ed9930
Message ID: <9211201648.AA19486@newsu.shearson.com>
Reply To: <9211191023.1.22089@cup.portal.com>
UTC Datetime: 1992-11-20 22:25:24 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 20 Nov 92 14:25:24 PST

Raw message

From: pmetzger@shearson.com (Perry E. Metzger)
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 92 14:25:24 PST
To: hkhenson@cup.portal.com
Subject: The legality of PGP
In-Reply-To: <9211191023.1.22089@cup.portal.com>
Message-ID: <9211201648.AA19486@newsu.shearson.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>From: hkhenson@cup.portal.com

>Perry writes PGP is based on RSA . . . which has not granted a license
>for people to use . . . . using PGP is possibly a pattent violation . . .
>I wonder--I have RSA Mailsafe.  Do you think that would give me a license
>to use RSA if I loaded up PGP?  Keith

Doubtful -- RSA tends to be licensed on a per application per copy
basis, not on a per human basis. If it was licensed on a per-human
basis, I would have bought a personal "unlimited use" license long
ago.

Perry





Thread