1992-11-16 - re: Why remailers…

Header Data

From: Tom.Jennings@f111.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Tom Jennings)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6cd07dcd385b0772bf16384a35dd0fd73fee42ea9a48a37515dcf9c13183db70
Message ID: <3744.2B07398C@fidogate.FIDONET.ORG>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1992-11-16 06:27:49 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 15 Nov 92 22:27:49 PST

Raw message

From: Tom.Jennings@f111.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Tom Jennings)
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 92 22:27:49 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: re: Why remailers...
Message-ID: <3744.2B07398C@fidogate.FIDONET.ORG>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




 U> From: 74076.1041@CompuServe.COM (Hal)

re: why remailers aren't as exciting as RNG's.

Well, remailers are working, admittedly a bit clunky at the moment,
and RNGs being talked about aren't. And we're primarily hackers. Once
something's working, it's less interesting, no? :-)

The next step for remailers is to make them actually *usable*,
routinely. Their current status is no fault of the implementors, it's
a first pass and a test bed (I ain't complaining!)

I just don't think it's a big secret, nor a big problem. Development
is always slow and boring... :-)


--- ReadMail
 * Origin: tomj@fidosw.fidonet.org / World Power Systems (1:125/111)
--  
Tom Jennings - via FidoNet node 1:125/555
    UUCP - ...!uunet!hoptoad!kumr!fidogate!111!Tom.Jennings
INTERNET - Tom.Jennings@f111.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG





Thread