1992-11-20 - Re: The Dining Cryptographers Protocol

Header Data

From: Marc.Ringuette@GS80.SP.CS.CMU.EDU
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 96291047af1383bffd2f3f54495ff57ed7e44258a5e82ae13c6dbcd2809feed1
Message ID: <9211201907.AA12713@cygnus.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1992-11-20 22:17:44 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 20 Nov 92 14:17:44 PST

Raw message

From: Marc.Ringuette@GS80.SP.CS.CMU.EDU
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 92 14:17:44 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: The Dining Cryptographers Protocol
Message-ID: <9211201907.AA12713@cygnus.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Can DC-nets be used in a hierarchical or "backbone" framework to
reduce communications overhead?  

Bill Stewart (in personal mail) suggested that such a scheme could
satisfy my objections to DC-nets, namely that in order to get N-way
anonymity, you must exchange N bits of traffic per bit of anonymous
message transmitted.  But when we tried to come up with such a scheme,
it ended up being an unsatisfying hybrid of DC-nets and mixes.

If you know of a backbone arrangement for DC-nets with a local net of
size L<<N but an "anonymity parameter" of N, please tell us about it...


-- Marc Ringuette (mnr@cs.cmu.edu)





Thread