From: ccat@casa-next1.Stanford.EDU (Chris Beaumont)
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 92 15:04:50 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Encrypting all mail and the protection of..
Message-ID: <9211202300.AA10992@ casa-next1.Stanford.EDU >
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



I thinat in the case of      n reading back over the debate about mail encryptionthrough the encryption debate,my main thought seems to
be,like the someone said earlier, that really the thing to push for is a
mass people's movement to encrypyt all mail as a matter of course,
with the tools to encrypt/decrypt be ing programs whose source code
is freely published and open to scrutiny.Ultimately,if ALL mail, of
any kind is routinely encrypted and decrypted using a suitable encryption
metheod,privacy will be something we will tajke for granted.This right
should be guaranteed via a Constitutional amendment.The decreasing cost of
silicon will make this increasingly practical, and the money saved through
the curtailment of credit card fraud,etc. (uncrackable digital suignatures would also have
a side-benefit in that they would eliminate most credit card fraud.)would
make this a win win situation..(except fotr the spooks and the crooks..)

-Chris.