From: simsong@next.cambridge.ma.us (Simson L. Garfinkel)
To: George A. Gleason <gg@well.sf.ca.us>
Message Hash: e2ff09f54c95f1e342225a9d808dc1c14607d0b260f376c4e583dbe5b4e286d3
Message ID: <9211121334.AA08156@next.cambridge.ma.us>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1992-11-12 15:24:57 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 12 Nov 92 07:24:57 PST
From: simsong@next.cambridge.ma.us (Simson L. Garfinkel)
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 92 07:24:57 PST
To: George A. Gleason <gg@well.sf.ca.us>
Subject: Re: (fwd) A Silver Bullet to Limit Crypto?
Message-ID: <9211121334.AA08156@next.cambridge.ma.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Hi. I'm new to this list. Some people may know me.
> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 03:06:19 -0800
> From: George A. Gleason <gg@well.sf.ca.us>
> To: cypherpunks@toad.com, tcmay@netcom.com
> Subject: Re: (fwd) A Silver Bullet to Limit Crypto?
>
> Now that the
> Dems are in power, we might consider tying the crypto key issue to the
> elimination of voter registration, on the basis that both voting and digital
> communication are forms of speech which should not be subjected to a
> chilling effect.
>
Good luck. As a practicing journalist, I can say that there is no way that I
could make this argument in print. Everybody understand voter registration.
There's support for the motor-voter bill. I can't even explain cryptography in
the same amount of time that it takes to do an entire article on voter
registration.
There may be a theoretical connection between the two, but you'll never make
that argument outside a university.
Return to November 1992
Return to “simsong@next.cambridge.ma.us (Simson L. Garfinkel)”
1992-11-12 (Thu, 12 Nov 92 07:24:57 PST) - Re: (fwd) A Silver Bullet to Limit Crypto? - simsong@next.cambridge.ma.us (Simson L. Garfinkel)