From: Tom.Jennings@f111.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Tom Jennings)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ea8cb21e32a90194c56b04301e9196dd1c4e140bda2b32a4ab4a4208f9574246
Message ID: <3587.2B02D6F4@fidogate.FIDONET.ORG>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1992-11-12 22:28:48 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 12 Nov 92 14:28:48 PST
From: Tom.Jennings@f111.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Tom Jennings)
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 92 14:28:48 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: re: Re: (fwd) A Silver Bullet to Limit Crypto?
Message-ID: <3587.2B02D6F4@fidogate.FIDONET.ORG>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
U> From: gg@well.sf.ca.us (George A. Gleason)
U> Rapid promulgation of decent user-friendly PKSs looks
U> pretty essential at this point. I'm thinking, how about
U> approaching Apple to see if they'll include a PKS along
U> with their Macs, as bundled software, sort of like
U> Hypercard. Even if the PKS which is used, has some
U> problem with is, as for instance the old trapdoor-knapsack
U> system, **anything** is preferable to nothing at all when
U> it comes to getting the public educated.
I agree 101% -- I'd rather have a "bad" system in place, with people
asking for a good one (and roundly complaining about the short-sighted
implementors :-) than to sit and wait until we can implement the
"right" system.
I'd much rather have email users want privacy and rag about their
compromised system. Even a relatively poor one buts some substantial
blocks into routine bulk monitoring of traffic...
As frequently happens, the real problem is not technical.
--- ReadMail
* Origin: tomj@fidosw.fidonet.org / World Power Systems (1:125/111)
--
Tom Jennings - via FidoNet node 1:125/555
UUCP: ...!uunet!hoptoad!kumr!fidogate!111!Tom.Jennings
INTERNET: Tom.Jennings@f111.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG
Return to November 1992
Return to “Tom.Jennings@f111.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Tom Jennings)”