1992-11-12 - (fwd) A Silver Bullet to Limit Crypto?

Header Data

From: Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: f3477488c96030fc32f332097f54f4f2acaf05dc3ce5491819e6e07219542274
Message ID: <9211121557.AA25427@soda.berkeley.edu>
Reply To: <199211121106.AA25693@well.sf.ca.us>
UTC Datetime: 1992-11-12 15:57:00 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 12 Nov 92 07:57:00 PST

Raw message

From: Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 92 07:57:00 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: (fwd) A Silver Bullet to Limit Crypto?
In-Reply-To: <199211121106.AA25693@well.sf.ca.us>
Message-ID: <9211121557.AA25427@soda.berkeley.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Re: tying voter and crypto registration issues togther.

An excellent idea, if both succeed.  But since voter registration is
already a partisan issue, tying crypto registration to it make crypto
a partisan issue.  And once you've made it a partisan issue, you've
lost, fundamentally.  

The way to succeed on any issue is to avoid polarization along party
lines.  One should not assume that there will be automatically a large
opposition.

Eric





Thread