1992-12-23 - Stripping signatures (was Re: Remailers)
Header Data
From: Marc Horowitz <marc@MIT.EDU>
To: edgar@spectrx.Saigon.COM (Edgar W. Swank)
Message Hash: 3709f2058b236e0893c05547973548d3c7b836c2c1a8f1e080447c75c23809da
Message ID: <9212232135.AA00768@deathtongue.MIT.EDU>
Reply To: <ywm8VB8w165w@spectrx.saigon.com>
UTC Datetime: 1992-12-23 21:36:28 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 23 Dec 92 13:36:28 PST
Raw message
From: Marc Horowitz <marc@MIT.EDU>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 92 13:36:28 PST
To: edgar@spectrx.Saigon.COM (Edgar W. Swank)
Subject: Stripping signatures (was Re: Remailers)
In-Reply-To: <ywm8VB8w165w@spectrx.saigon.com>
Message-ID: <9212232135.AA00768@deathtongue.MIT.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I think that signatures should be kept. If you really want to be
anonymous, you have bigger things to worry about than your sig showing
up or not.
And if I want to build a pseudonymous identity for myself, I might
want to have a sig for that identity. I wouldn't want the remailers
stripping that out.
Perhaps it would make sense to have a header field which indicated if
the sig should be kept or not.
Marc
Thread
Return to December 1992
- Return to “edgar@spectrx.Saigon.COM (Edgar W. Swank)”
Return to “Marc Horowitz <marc@MIT.EDU>”
- 1992-12-23 (Tue, 22 Dec 92 19:40:22 PST) - Remailers - edgar@spectrx.Saigon.COM (Edgar W. Swank)
- 1992-12-23 (Wed, 23 Dec 92 13:36:28 PST) - Stripping signatures (was Re: Remailers) - Marc Horowitz <marc@MIT.EDU>