1992-12-17 - No Subject

Header Data

From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
To: dclunie@pax.tpa.com.AU (David Clunie)
Message Hash: 8f701406dabe21fc29afcfacb58c1c1197780dc07066d8caafaba9185182be18
Message ID: <9212172137.AA04528@deathtongue.MIT.EDU>
Reply To: <9212172122.AA00432@britt>
UTC Datetime: 1992-12-17 21:38:49 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 17 Dec 92 13:38:49 PST

Raw message

From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 92 13:38:49 PST
To: dclunie@pax.tpa.com.AU (David Clunie)
Subject: No Subject
In-Reply-To: <9212172122.AA00432@britt>
Message-ID: <9212172137.AA04528@deathtongue.MIT.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> This does not mean though, that it is illegal to reinvent the wheel and
> apply it yourself.

I'm sorry to say that yes, it *IS* illegal to reinvent the wheel and
apply it yourself.  In the US it is called "Patent Infringement".
Now, this may not apply to EVERYTHING, but there are cases where
people re-invented something that was classified and their work then
became classified....

(I also believe there are stories where the opposite is true, but I
don't want to belabor the point)







Thread