1992-12-14 - Re: Remailers.

Header Data

From: Eli Brandt <ebrandt@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: da8c79fe8ba7ee91de7dd61e5a33e48562e012f7375f2c055c73b4e07d4e2c93
Message ID: <9212142118.AA03045@toad.com>
Reply To: <921214165323_74076.1041_DHJ77-1@CompuServe.COM>
UTC Datetime: 1992-12-14 21:18:36 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 14 Dec 92 13:18:36 PST

Raw message

From: Eli Brandt <ebrandt@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 92 13:18:36 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Remailers.
In-Reply-To: <921214165323_74076.1041_DHJ77-1@CompuServe.COM>
Message-ID: <9212142118.AA03045@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

> Eric Hollander has been creating a list of remailers;
> perhaps he could solicit this kind of information from the operators
> and publish it along with the remailer addresses and keys.

(Hey, everybody send your remailer information in!)

I have been deleting the logs every so often, unread since I debugged
the remailer.  If someone asks me if their message made it, I'll look
at them.  If someone gives me evidence of blackmail or the like, I'll
look at them.  Otherwise, to the bit bucket they go.

As usual, you should encrypt your message if you want it to be secure.
This is a multi-user system.  Furthermore, I may read the remail logs
from time to time as I tweak the software.  (eg add PGP, if I can fix
the "keygen error"...)

It may be worth pointing out that this gives me a plausible reason to
stonewall if someone comes asking about something *I* sent through my

> Hal

   Eli   ebrandt@jarthur.claremont.edu