From: Eli Brandt <ebrandt@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 92 21:57:33 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Suggest splitting things up
In-Reply-To: <9212030436.AA01770@edev0.TFS>
Message-ID: <9212030557.AA06522@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> From: Peter Shipley <shipley@tfs.COM>

> I suggest to groups be split as suggested  but I will like to add
> that it be donw 

[ a different way ]

Before we consider splitting the list, we should ask whether there are
a significant number of people who would take less than all of the
sublists.  I really don't know.  If the purpose is just to provide a
way to know what "kind" of message you're about to read, we could use
a "tag" the way sci.v-w does, if we find this necessary.  I personally
don't object to this kind of list volume.

> 		-Pete

   Eli   ebrandt@jarthur.claremont.edu