From: pfarrell@cs.gmu.edu (Pat Farrell)
To: jim@tadpole.com
Message Hash: 3371eca89f6e642bd9da5c2b7dbbae89217a85b8495d16abd13c02168d0e1c89
Message ID: <9301261824.AA23577@cs.gmu.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-01-26 18:29:30 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 26 Jan 93 10:29:30 PST
From: pfarrell@cs.gmu.edu (Pat Farrell)
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 93 10:29:30 PST
To: jim@tadpole.com
Subject: Re: Rational PC mail , was Re: PGP on BBS
Message-ID: <9301261824.AA23577@cs.gmu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Jim,
While serial ports do lose characters, especially if you don't have
a 16550afn serial chip, I don't see this as a major hassle. In a pure
DOS space, you really arn't likely to lose the characters, and this
is the initial space of NUpop. With Windows, you have to learn to play
with the priorities to make it work well, or get one of the intellegent
serial driver DLLs that make it transparent.
It is possible that the authors of the NUpop document don't worry too
much about single character dropouts. There is plenty of redundancy in
english. PGP will complain, but I can see retransmitting a message
half a dozen times to get it thru cleanly will lose.
I never allow my private key anywhere near a serial port. The public keys
are checksummed, so it is easy to see that a character is wrong.
I'd love to be able to use CSLIP. We (a bunch of folks on this campus) have
just convinced the admin to allow POP services. It will take a while before
we can convince them to allow SLIP, CSLIP, and PPP. In the meantime,
I'll happily live with NUpop's serial support.
Pat
Return to January 1993
Return to “pfarrell@cs.gmu.edu (Pat Farrell)”
1993-01-26 (Tue, 26 Jan 93 10:29:30 PST) - Re: Rational PC mail , was Re: PGP on BBS - pfarrell@cs.gmu.edu (Pat Farrell)