From: Karl L. Barrus <barrus@tree.egr.uh.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 3edf41dfff883d8716fe868183712f9822248854e2f280636ec845364e546479
Message ID: <9301131714.AA02844@tree.egr.uh.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-01-13 17:15:34 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 13 Jan 93 09:15:34 PST
From: Karl L. Barrus <barrus@tree.egr.uh.edu>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 93 09:15:34 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: re: mental poker protocol
Message-ID: <9301131714.AA02844@tree.egr.uh.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Hal writes:
>Am I missing something in the description of the protocol, or was the
>actual protocol perhaps a little different than this?
Oops. I typed too quickly; the posted protocol specified shuffling
the entire deck to form message M3. Thus, each player draws from a
full deck. While this isn't exactly poker, I'm still willing to play
somebody. So Hal's right: the original protocol is different - it's
not broken like the one I posted :-)
The post to sci.crypt was in response to a bit commitment question.
Here, players commit by making public their hashes. Later, everyone
can verify when the messages are known.
If anyone's interested, send me a notice to elee9sf@menudo.uh.edu.
(The server for my other account is acting erratic and I'm considering
moving my subscription).
/-----------------------------------\
| Karl L. Barrus |
| elee9sf@menudo.uh.edu | <- preferred address
| barrus@tree.egr.uh.edu (NeXTMail) |
\-----------------------------------/
Return to January 1993
Return to “Karl L. Barrus <barrus@tree.egr.uh.edu>”
1993-01-13 (Wed, 13 Jan 93 09:15:34 PST) - re: mental poker protocol - Karl L. Barrus <barrus@tree.egr.uh.edu>