From: Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
To: jpp@markv.com
Message Hash: 4bf035ad73a2a0965b58e766e747bb1f7376f6d16f93f00db8cabbbee526847c
Message ID: <9301291945.AA03526@soda.berkeley.edu>
Reply To: <9301272043.aa08979@hermix.markv.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-01-29 19:48:07 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 29 Jan 93 11:48:07 PST
From: Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 93 11:48:07 PST
To: jpp@markv.com
Subject: thresholding to enhance secrecy
In-Reply-To: <9301272043.aa08979@hermix.markv.com>
Message-ID: <9301291945.AA03526@soda.berkeley.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
It seems that your "thresholding" schemes require an increase in
message size. Do I read this correctly?
It also seems that you need to generate one time pads to effect this
increase in message size, with all the attendant costs of making that
quantity of random bits.
Eric
Return to January 1993
Return to “Jay Prime Positive <jpp@markv.com>”