From: wayner@cs.cornell.edu (Peter Wayner)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 53a3b824e958c81ee43d1a88be68040e6d3644f398ff3dc2d539fdaab650fa72
Message ID: <9301142206.AA23922@brokk.cs.cornell.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-01-14 22:06:54 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 14 Jan 93 14:06:54 PST
From: wayner@cs.cornell.edu (Peter Wayner)
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 93 14:06:54 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <9301142206.AA23922@brokk.cs.cornell.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I often find it useful to think about these matters
by mapping them over to the real world.
Anonymous remailers are really quite common. Here
are a few common sources:
1) Academic journals which review papers. These
often keep the names of the reviewers and the names
of the paper authors hidden to allow people the
chnace to speak freely.
2) Newspapers with personals sections offer both
anonymous mailboxes and anonymous voiceboxes for
obvious reasons.
3) The WSJ also offers these advertisements for executive searches.
4) The Police, in some cities, maintain anonymous tip lines.
They also occasionaly offer cash rewards to these
anonymous tipsters. I think the NYPD has a anonymity office set
up to do just this.
I realize that the cypherpunk mailing list likes
to cloak itself in the romance of the counter
culture, but in moments like this it might
make sense to think about how mainstream and
suburban and respectable the concept of
anonymous mailers can be. In many cases,
authority reacts to the perceived threat--
not to the threat itself.
-Peter Wayner
Return to January 1993
Return to “wayner@cs.cornell.edu (Peter Wayner)”
1993-01-14 (Thu, 14 Jan 93 14:06:54 PST) - No Subject - wayner@cs.cornell.edu (Peter Wayner)