From: Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 92afb729b8e3e80378033b749c6bcc821030633d7155e8434399a2a95b4fbb24
Message ID: <9301211650.AA02533@soda.berkeley.edu>
Reply To: <9301150739.AA02931@deathtongue.MIT.EDU>
UTC Datetime: 1993-01-21 16:52:29 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 21 Jan 93 08:52:29 PST
From: Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 93 08:52:29 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: possible solution to the anonymous h
In-Reply-To: <9301150739.AA02931@deathtongue.MIT.EDU>
Message-ID: <9301211650.AA02533@soda.berkeley.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>I thought about this. The major problem is that once the PEM
>beta-testing period ends, all keys must be registered with "approved"
>(by RSA) central authorities. I highly doubt they'd issue
>pseudonymous keys, but maybe they would allow someone to set up a
>heirarchy especially for that purpose. I'm not convinced.
I found out last Friday at the RSA conference that RSADSI itself is
going to issue "persona" (i.e. no attempt to find out who it really
is) certificates for free.
That's right. No charge.
Eric
Return to January 1993
Return to “uri@watson.ibm.com”