From: dclunie@pax.tpa.com.au (David Clunie)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: aaa8d08f0c017ad07c315c5bdf1afb86b1a7b3f66136c01774fc8a2f084d33f4
Message ID: <9301150805.AA01054@britt>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-01-15 08:05:55 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 15 Jan 93 00:05:55 PST
From: dclunie@pax.tpa.com.au (David Clunie)
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 93 00:05:55 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: possible solution to the anonymous h
Message-ID: <9301150805.AA01054@britt>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> I thought about this. The major problem is that once the PEM
> beta-testing period ends, all keys must be registered with "approved"
> (by RSA) central authorities. I highly doubt they'd issue
> pseudonymous keys, but maybe they would allow someone to set up a
> heirarchy especially for that purpose. I'm not convinced.
Who says ? RSA may wish this to happen, but surely anyone who wants to can
set up their own key service.
david
Return to January 1993
Return to “Marc Horowitz <marc@MIT.EDU>”