1993-02-25 - Re: Poor Man’s Anonymous Remailer
Header Data
From: George A. Gleason <gg@well.sf.ca.us>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 213cd17fd1c275978448a71daf45c094ed4b987b15b94739e0120f126344338e
Message ID: <199302250904.AA03970@well.sf.ca.us>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-02-25 09:07:18 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 25 Feb 93 01:07:18 PST
Raw message
From: George A. Gleason <gg@well.sf.ca.us>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 93 01:07:18 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Poor Man's Anonymous Remailer
Message-ID: <199302250904.AA03970@well.sf.ca.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Duncan's posting about AT&T mail as a "poor man's anonymous mailbox" misses
one crucial fact. The moment you dial an 800 number, you generate a record
of your phone number via ANI, which means AT&T gets that information in
realtime and can probably correlate it with your phone account and service
address and name. If you want anonymity, never ever ever use any service
which requires you call in via an 800 number.
-gg@well.sf.ca.us
Thread
Return to February 1993
- Return to “George A. Gleason <gg@well.sf.ca.us>”
- Return to “Phiber Optik <phiber@eff.org>”
Return to “thug@phantom.com (Murdering Thug)”
- 1993-02-25 (Thu, 25 Feb 93 01:07:18 PST) - Re: Poor Man’s Anonymous Remailer - George A. Gleason <gg@well.sf.ca.us>
- 1993-02-25 (Thu, 25 Feb 93 07:17:06 PST) - Re: Poor Man’s Anonymous Remailer - thug@phantom.com (Murdering Thug)
- 1993-02-26 (Thu, 25 Feb 93 18:15:09 PST) - Re: Poor Man’s Anonymous Remailer - Phiber Optik <phiber@eff.org>
- 1993-02-25 (Thu, 25 Feb 93 07:17:06 PST) - Re: Poor Man’s Anonymous Remailer - thug@phantom.com (Murdering Thug)