From: Stu Klingman <stuk@microsoft.com>
To: ssandfort@attmail.com
Message Hash: 29ab693cdfc91b203e276e582d44132028fc066478a98bddb4ab43b07c8508b1
Message ID: <9302202014.AA00308@netmail.microsoft.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-02-20 20:17:03 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 20 Feb 93 12:17:03 PST
From: Stu Klingman <stuk@microsoft.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 93 12:17:03 PST
To: ssandfort@attmail.com
Subject: LIST RULES and Advertising
Message-ID: <9302202014.AA00308@netmail.microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I know my reaction when being hit with the ad was,
"Hey! what the fuck is this!?", followed by,
"Okay, this person doesn't know any better".
If you've been on the net for a while, you'd know
that ads are >most< tre gauch.
If we really want to resolve the censorship stigma
and still be able to ignore the ads, perhaps we
could put AD: in front of any ad that was RELEVANT
to the list, and then we could filter them out, or
not, as the case may be.I've got to admit, the idea
of reading ads pertinent to the cypherpunks list
intrigues me.
Judges?
Return to February 1993
Return to “Stu Klingman <stuk@microsoft.com>”
1993-02-20 (Sat, 20 Feb 93 12:17:03 PST) - LIST RULES and Advertising - Stu Klingman <stuk@microsoft.com>