1993-02-19 - Re: Defending Free Speech and Liberty

Header Data

From: “L. Detweiler” <ld231782@longs.lance.colostate.edu>
To: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Message Hash: 2eb09c2a3d66b7104b564a4ac379a29e78c421b09a658cd54bcf2d0c54ee3f03
Message ID: <9302191910.AA05405@longs.lance.colostate.edu>
Reply To: <9302190714.AA23494@netcom.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-02-19 19:11:39 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 19 Feb 93 11:11:39 PST

Raw message

From: "L. Detweiler" <ld231782@longs.lance.colostate.edu>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 93 11:11:39 PST
To: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Subject: Re: Defending Free Speech and Liberty
In-Reply-To: <9302190714.AA23494@netcom.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <9302191910.AA05405@longs.lance.colostate.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


[t.c. May]
>I say, let's expand the scope of the Cypherpunks list to include more
>discussion of viruses. We can't let it become a monopoly of the Authorities
>(the Brunner Authority instead of the Turing Authority?)

I say, unless it has to do with cryptography, please don't. Does
anybody else want a lot of virus articles on this list?  I found the
original thug article a bit questionable, as I said. But a new list
(viruspunks?) might be a good idea.





Thread