From: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 3401a8b7ee772a5c48526153cf0b951b086da7908fc6aaaf0a6860e9264d0d0b
Message ID: <9302280521.AA00526@netcom.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-02-28 05:23:28 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 27 Feb 93 21:23:28 PST
From: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 93 21:23:28 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: more ideas on anonymity
Message-ID: <9302280521.AA00526@netcom.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Marc Horowitz writes:
>With certain exceptions, like the mailbox example, most situations of
>"rent foo" require the lessor to take a risk, and he wants *some*
>assurance that he'll get his rented thing back. I'm not going to rent
>a car to someone without ID, for cash, because I have no guarantee
>that he isn't going to drive away with it and never come back.
Precisely. The car rental company _does_ have a continuing relationship
with you, at least until you return their car.
(BTW, digital escrow services may allow relative anonymity--and perhaps
true anonymity--while still assuring the rental car company that they'll
get paid and will get their car back. Think of this as a surety
bond...though I suppose that many of those who don't have credit cards, for
economic reasons, will also not have $10,000 in cash laying around to post
such a bond.)
>I'm not saying discrimination against cash doesn't exist. It does,
>and that's reprehensible. But not all cases of "plastic, yes, cash,
>no" are discriminatory.
I see nothing reprehensible about discrimination against certain kinds of
payment. Maybe I don't want to carry $10,000 around in East L.A. and
instead want to be paid with a cashier's check. Maybe I just think folding
money has too many germs on it.
The point is, nobody is being coerced into an economic transaction. If I
offer my car for sale for $10,000 in copper pennies, that's the way it is.
(There is some confusing legalistic stuff about debts and "legal tender,"
applying, as I understand it, to debts already incurred. But I'm arguing
the principle, not the situaion in these Beknighted States.)
-Tim May
--
Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
tcmay@netcom.com | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
408-688-5409 | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
W.A.S.T.E.: Aptos, CA | black markets, collapse of governments.
Higher Power: 2^756839 | Public Key: MailSafe and PGP available.
Return to February 1993
Return to “tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)”
1993-02-28 (Sat, 27 Feb 93 21:23:28 PST) - Re: more ideas on anonymity - tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)