1993-02-08 - Re: Compressed/Encrypted Voice using Modems

Header Data

From: Phiber Optik <phiber@eff.org>
To: jim@tadpole.com (Jim Thompson)
Message Hash: 3cb876bf71d007c3ddc00b0a9f57488e9d9d41461efa213f8d7e20df01ca32d8
Message ID: <199302081649.AA13414@eff.org>
Reply To: <9302081014.AA01029@ono-sendai>
UTC Datetime: 1993-02-08 16:50:43 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 8 Feb 93 08:50:43 PST

Raw message

From: Phiber Optik <phiber@eff.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 93 08:50:43 PST
To: jim@tadpole.com (Jim Thompson)
Subject: Re:  Compressed/Encrypted Voice using Modems
In-Reply-To: <9302081014.AA01029@ono-sendai>
Message-ID: <199302081649.AA13414@eff.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> 
> The shannon limit of 22kpbs has something to do with the
> frequency response of a 'standard' (old, non digital) POTS
> phone line.
> 
> But you should know, you're Phil Karn (and I'm not.)
> 
> Jim
> 

I spent the time posting a considerable message about this subject last night,
and I've yet to see it echoed back to me on the list.  Did ANYONE get it?
Topics were Shannon's capacity formula, Shannon limit, Nyquist 2-bit rule, etc.
I'd be very annoyed if it just 'disappeared' into the bit-bucket.






Thread