1993-02-23 - Re:
Header Data
From: Johan Helsingius <julf@penet.FI>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6f533c1ae17523a06b01e6e5029993dec9792298c3a19d48b21d9003e95cef66
Message ID: <9302230933.aa20090@penet.penet.FI>
Reply To: <9302230654.AA10264@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1993-02-23 08:22:19 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 23 Feb 93 00:22:19 PST
Raw message
From: Johan Helsingius <julf@penet.FI>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 93 00:22:19 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re:
In-Reply-To: <9302230654.AA10264@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>
Message-ID: <9302230933.aa20090@penet.penet.FI>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> I think it's wrong for anon.penet.fi to operate this way.
Well, then, how *should* anon.penet.fi operate? I really am open to
suggestions...
Julf
Thread
Return to February 1993
- Return to “Johan Helsingius <julf@penet.FI>”
Return to “nowhere@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Anonymous)”
- 1993-02-23 (Mon, 22 Feb 93 22:57:35 PST) - No Subject - nowhere@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Anonymous)
- 1993-02-23 (Tue, 23 Feb 93 00:22:19 PST) - Re: - Johan Helsingius <julf@penet.FI>