From: Anonymous@cs.Buffalo.EDU
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 93 09:15:46 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: anonymous mail
Message-ID: <9302201714.AA11332@armstrong.cs.Buffalo.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Bob Stratton stated in the last message:
>Received: by toad.com id AA00166; Sat, 20 Feb 93 07:04:10 PST
>Return-Path: <strat@intercon.com>
>Received: from cygnus.com by toad.com id AA00161; Sat, 20 Feb 93 07:04:08 PST
>Received: from intercon.com by cygnus.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
>	id AA18518; Sat, 20 Feb 93 06:43:27 PST
>Received: by intercon.com (911016.SGI/920928.RS)
>	for cypherpunks@toad.com id AA21465; Sat, 20 Feb 93 09:42:09 -0500

>>>>>> On Fri, 19 Feb 1993 23:24:43 -0800, nobody@pmantis.berkeley.edu said:
>	nobody> This message routed through 8 remailers, sent around
>	nobody> 11:50 CST 2/19/93: pmantis -> soda -> alumni -> rebma
>	nobody> -> rosebud -> mead -> shell -> buffalo
>
>Are you sure? If that's true, then someone along the way is munging
>the headers pretty badly, because my Received: lines show it going
>from
>
>pmantis -> toad.com -> me


This is correct in the same way I can see that the message sent from you
was sent from intercon.com -> cygnus.com -> toad.com -> me


-- 
+==== Internet: babani@cs.buffalo.edu ===+======== Amateur-Radio: N2LYC ======+
!      Bitnet: V078LNGT@ubvms.BITNET     |        UUCP: rutgers!ub!babani     !
! Alternate: an173@cleveland.freenet.edu | Plsure dpnds on the othrs prmison. !
+==  PGP key available. (If you don't know what a PGP key is... find out!)  ==+