From: gnu (John Gilmore)
To: cypherpunks
Message Hash: 83198bd566cba87ce5f1484ce5c147e5481f5fe7f004fed74e57f35941adf8f4
Message ID: <9302131219.AA13076@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-02-13 12:19:30 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 13 Feb 93 04:19:30 PST
From: gnu (John Gilmore)
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 93 04:19:30 PST
To: cypherpunks
Subject: [gnu@toad.com: Re: Technology Policy and Information Infrastructure ]
Message-ID: <9302131219.AA13076@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
------- Forwarded Message
To: "Vinton G. Cerf" <vcerf@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>, gnu@toad.com
Subject: Re: Technology Policy and Information Infrastructure
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 93 01:43:31 -0800
From: gnu@toad.com
Sound bites for Congress re technology policy and information infrastructure:
* Government investment invariably brings government control, which
is harmful to the development of a communications medium in a free
and open society.
* The Government seized control of telegraphy, radio, and television
early in their development, and they have never had full First Amendment
protection.
* Private, interactive electronic media involve Fourth and Fifth Amendment
issues as well.
* The Executive Branch is already advocating broad wiretapping, and
banning of privacy technologies, and they don't even own the network.
If the government owned the network, there'd be no stopping them.
* The risk of moving society into media where individual rights are
regularly abridged is too great. Economics is pushing us into
individual electronic communication, regardless.
* If Congress truly believes in the Bill of Rights, it should get the
hell out of the networking business and stay out of it.
John Gilmore
(not speaking for) Electronic Frontier Foundation
(but ask EFF if they want to say something like this...)
------- End of Forwarded Message
Return to February 1993
Return to “gnu (John Gilmore)”
1993-02-13 (Sat, 13 Feb 93 04:19:30 PST) - [gnu@toad.com: Re: Technology Policy and Information Infrastructure ] - gnu (John Gilmore)