1993-02-05 - Re: `Sunday Times’ article on GSM changes
Header Data
From: pmetzger@shearson.com (Perry E. Metzger)
To: huntting@glarp.com
Message Hash: 8e53052c887aba7cd02aad3630dcf315cf20c027fb1f8c93959f1b9c9d212bd7
Message ID: <9302051715.AA22381@maggie.shearson.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-02-05 18:53:24 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 5 Feb 93 10:53:24 PST
Raw message
From: pmetzger@shearson.com (Perry E. Metzger)
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 93 10:53:24 PST
To: huntting@glarp.com
Subject: Re: `Sunday Times' article on GSM changes
Message-ID: <9302051715.AA22381@maggie.shearson.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> From: Brad Huntting <huntting@glarp.com>
>
> It would seem that both the sender and reciever need to be exactly
> syncronized to within 1/4 of a bit for this to work. Since voice
> data requires about 64Khz
Just as a point of information, you can compress voice into 4kbit/sec
without any real loss of quality.
Perry
Thread
Return to February 1993
- Return to “gnu (John Gilmore)”
- Return to “Johan Helsingius <julf@penet.FI>”
Return to “pmetzger@shearson.com (Perry E. Metzger)”
- 1993-02-05 (Fri, 5 Feb 93 10:53:24 PST) - Re: `Sunday Times’ article on GSM changes - pmetzger@shearson.com (Perry E. Metzger)
- 1993-02-05 (Fri, 5 Feb 93 11:17:05 PST) - Re: `Sunday Times’ article on GSM changes - gnu (John Gilmore)
- 1993-02-05 (Fri, 5 Feb 93 12:22:44 PST) - Re: `Sunday Times’ article on GSM changes - Johan Helsingius <julf@penet.FI>