1993-02-22 - Re: Being kind to 8086 users - was: Re: msdos perl
Header Data
From: Eli Brandt <ebrandt@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a31e64d4f5d176841fd04ded003139f18581f78379b1996e00b6dcc92a4934eb
Message ID: <9302222043.AA22967@toad.com>
Reply To: <9302222004.AA00911@anchor.ho.att.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-02-22 20:43:38 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 22 Feb 93 12:43:38 PST
Raw message
From: Eli Brandt <ebrandt@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 93 12:43:38 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Being kind to 8086 users - was: Re: msdos perl
In-Reply-To: <9302222004.AA00911@anchor.ho.att.com>
Message-ID: <9302222043.AA22967@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> There's one part of the market that's still heavily populated with
> 8086 machines - portables.
Good point. Perhaps maintaining compatibility with this particular
archaism is not a bad idea after all. Urk.
> Bill Stewart
Eli ebrandt@jarthur.claremont.edu
Thread
Return to February 1993
- Return to “Crys Rides <crys@cave.tcp.COM>”
- Return to “Eli Brandt <ebrandt@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>”
- Return to “peter honeyman <honey@citi.umich.edu>”
Return to “wcs@anchor.ho.att.com (Bill_Stewart(HOY002)1305)”
- 1993-02-22 (Mon, 22 Feb 93 12:05:06 PST) - Being kind to 8086 users - was: Re: msdos perl - wcs@anchor.ho.att.com (Bill_Stewart(HOY002)1305)
- 1993-02-22 (Mon, 22 Feb 93 12:43:38 PST) - Re: Being kind to 8086 users - was: Re: msdos perl - Eli Brandt <ebrandt@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>
- 1993-02-22 (Mon, 22 Feb 93 15:48:25 PST) - Re: Being kind to 8086 users - was: Re: msdos perl - Crys Rides <crys@cave.tcp.COM>
- 1993-02-23 (Mon, 22 Feb 93 19:24:15 PST) - Re: Being kind to 8086 users - was: Re: msdos perl - peter honeyman <honey@citi.umich.edu>