From: Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: b5362bb04e41ee5725c3451ad85f2b4d9739de5d356a28595ecb20bcc5f7724d
Message ID: <9302230056.AA16126@soda.berkeley.edu>
Reply To: <9302230010.AA11413@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1993-02-23 01:00:03 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 22 Feb 93 17:00:03 PST
From: Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 93 17:00:03 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Remailer Use
In-Reply-To: <9302230010.AA11413@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>
Message-ID: <9302230056.AA16126@soda.berkeley.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Re: not discriminating between remailer mail and user mail.
The problem of persons uneducated in remailers not distinguishing
between different kinds of mail is a problem that will scale badly.
It looks like a problem that will have to be solved for any design
which relies on user accounts for remailing. I have one suggestion,
but I'd like to hear others.
Suggestion--Put a big "Comment:" field in each remailed message which
explains what is going on. Regular users will get tired of it, no
doubt. Perhaps it could be called "X-Remailer-Education:"
Eric
Return to February 1993
Return to “nowhere@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Chael Hall)”