1993-02-09 - Convincing people the value of anonymity…

Header Data

From: wayner@cs.cornell.edu (Peter Wayner)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: d79881cf872dab57e2ec3c4b895d3f1a5b0c70ce35dbc57db9412ee5614b7631
Message ID: <9302091320.AA19183@brokk.cs.cornell.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-02-09 13:22:03 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 9 Feb 93 05:22:03 PST

Raw message

From: wayner@cs.cornell.edu (Peter Wayner)
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 93 05:22:03 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Convincing people the value of anonymity...
Message-ID: <9302091320.AA19183@brokk.cs.cornell.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



I would think that many people who hang out on technical
newsgroups would be very familiar with the anonymous review
procedures practiced by academic journals. There is some value
when a reviewer can speak their mind about a paper without
worry of revenge. Of course everyone assures me that the system is never
really anonymous because there are alwys only three or four people qualified
to review each paper. :-) 

Perhaps we should go out of our way to make anonymous, technical
comments about papers and ideas in the newsgroups to fascilitate
the development of an anonymous commenting culture in cypberspace.

-Peter Wayner





Thread