From: Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: f4a5d9fe5204fce5567fe20782f2a48eb76fa79b9e0f1ca1bc69fc4eecb6ea5c
Message ID: <9302230117.AA18417@soda.berkeley.edu>
Reply To: <9302210334.AA02268@longs.lance.colostate.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1993-02-23 01:21:05 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 22 Feb 93 17:21:05 PST
From: Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 93 17:21:05 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: whistleblower newsgroup?
In-Reply-To: <9302210334.AA02268@longs.lance.colostate.edu>
Message-ID: <9302230117.AA18417@soda.berkeley.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
The moderator to alt.whistleblower, instead of a person's mail
address, could be a mail alias which invokes a header field stripper.
That way it would be impossible to post to the group with your
identity in the header. Every posting anonymous! Sort of like a
mathematical dual of alt.forgery.
I would also suggest a periodic posting explaining exactly how secure
that is. (Proof against casual attack, but not against local or
global network monitoring.)
It seems easy enough. I'd do it myself if I had root anywhere. The
perl scripts for remailing would be easily hacked. You could even
retain the automatic PGP decryption for the more informed, the more
paranoid.
Eric
Return to February 1993
Return to “ld231782@longs.lance.colostate.edu”