1993-02-02 - Remailer abuse?

Header Data

From: Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
To: nowhere@bsu-cs.bsu.edu
Message Hash: f8e1d48ce68920576b387b7f55d2d0e744e9a638e11150f614384b7882522841
Message ID: <9302020002.AA18305@soda.berkeley.edu>
Reply To: <9301302324.AA01308@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1993-02-02 00:04:42 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 1 Feb 93 16:04:42 PST

Raw message

From: Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 93 16:04:42 PST
To: nowhere@bsu-cs.bsu.edu
Subject: Remailer abuse?
In-Reply-To: <9301302324.AA01308@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>
Message-ID: <9302020002.AA18305@soda.berkeley.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

Re: adding notes indicating remailing.

There is a standard RFC-822 field, Comment, which would be perfect for
just such an application.  The original remailer I wrote added the
header field Remailed-By to indicate this.

You could also use another standard 822 field, Sender, as follows:

	Sender: anonymous remailing service <remailer@host>

Either way, the note goes in the header, where it can be seen or
stripped, but in any case handled without munging the message body.