1993-03-26 - Re: Many Important Items in the News

Header Data

From: “L. Detweiler” <ld231782@longs.lance.colostate.edu>
To: Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
Message Hash: 45128e554b65ec3623992d511b11fb0cd07cde25f257701b6c4e53c1633b8877
Message ID: <9303262110.AA06813@longs.lance.colostate.edu>
Reply To: <9303260756.AA24450@soda.berkeley.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1993-03-26 21:12:13 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 26 Mar 93 13:12:13 PST

Raw message

From: "L. Detweiler" <ld231782@longs.lance.colostate.edu>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 93 13:12:13 PST
To: Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Re: Many Important Items in the News
In-Reply-To: <9303260756.AA24450@soda.berkeley.edu>
Message-ID: <9303262110.AA06813@longs.lance.colostate.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>All the more reason to allow the backbone admins the power to not pass
>anonymous articles.  It won't work, they'll feel like they're in
>control, and everyone wins.

wait, are you advocating news admins allowed to filter anonymous mail
from downstream/upstream feeds?  I don't get this.

Thread

• Return to March 1993

• Return to “Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>”
• Return to ““L. Detweiler” <ld231782@longs.lance.colostate.edu>”

• Return to “peter honeyman <honey@citi.umich.edu>”

• 1993-03-26 (Thu, 25 Mar 93 21:49:26 PST) - Re: Many Important Items in the News - peter honeyman <honey@citi.umich.edu>
  • 1993-03-26 (Fri, 26 Mar 93 00:00:42 PST) - Many Important Items in the News - Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
    • 1993-03-26 (Fri, 26 Mar 93 13:12:13 PST) - Re: Many Important Items in the News - “L. Detweiler” <ld231782@longs.lance.colostate.edu>
      • 1993-03-27 (Fri, 26 Mar 93 19:43:32 PST) - Many Important Items in the News - Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>