1993-03-01 - header field indicating an anonymous address

Header Data

From: Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 55cfb655fed15ae6832b79f2a290c5fb7a8bc1a9b8583b48269459d1e7e76e65
Message ID: <9303010202.AA17864@soda.berkeley.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-03-01 02:05:54 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 28 Feb 93 18:05:54 PST

Raw message

From: Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 93 18:05:54 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: header field indicating an anonymous address
Message-ID: <9303010202.AA17864@soda.berkeley.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Marc R. suggests that we standardize on a header field to indicate
that a message was anonymous.

I suggest "Anon-Sender:".  There's already a "Sender:" field in
RFC-822, indicating who sent the message, as separate from who wrote
the message.  The "Anon-Sender:" field should contain an email address
for the maintainer of the remailer. 

Why? To facilitate complaints. :-)

Eric

Thread

• Return to March 1993

• Return to “Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>”
• Return to “Johan Helsingius <julf@penet.FI>”

• Return to “strat@intercon.com (Bob Stratton)”

• 1993-03-01 (Sun, 28 Feb 93 18:05:54 PST) - header field indicating an anonymous address - Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
  • 1993-03-01 (Sun, 28 Feb 93 18:28:35 PST) - header field indicating an anonymous address - strat@intercon.com (Bob Stratton)
  • 1993-03-01 (Mon, 1 Mar 93 03:29:49 PST) - Re: header field indicating an anonymous address - Johan Helsingius <julf@penet.FI>